- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:06:55 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Seems to be a spec bug regarding @inlist. > 8. If in any of the previous steps a new subject was set to a > non-null value different from the parent object; This step seems to work better if you replace "the parent object" in the above instruction with "the parent subject". This change seems necessary to pass 0226. I've checked Gregg's implementation, and that's what he does too. To pass the remaining @inlist test cases, I found it necessary to attach an extra piece of metadata to the new empty list mapping, indicating which element was current when the mapping was created, and then before generating list triples, check that the same element is still current. Not sure if that metadata is necessary in the general case, or a quirk of how I've implemented something. But thought I'd mention it in case it's a useful technique for anyone else. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:05:18 UTC