Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

On 16 May 2012 11:12, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:58:03 +0200
> Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> actually, under the current resolution, the triple will be
>>
>> [] schema:url <http://www.example.org> .
>
> OK, it is perhaps less bad than I previously thought.

Is RDFa 1.1 still being designed?

Perhaps add both spelings of licen[sc]e to any special case list?

Dan


> But my point regarding [1] still stands.
>
> ____
> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/
> 2008Sep/thread.html#msg20
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:14:49 UTC