W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Fwd: Hanging @property

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:47:47 +0100
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, James Leigh <james@leighnet.ca>
Message-Id: <68656374-0C40-44C7-A81A-EB4A597B7E3A@w3.org>
To: Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

James is correct in his remark. This is a purely editorial change, so I went ahead and changed the rdfa core working document (ie, Overview-src). I hope this is fine with you.

James, thank you!


Begin forwarded message:

> From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
> Subject: Hanging @property
> Date: February 8, 2012 21:17:40 GMT+01:00
> To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> Hi Ivan,
> Apologies for sending this directly to you, but it seems like a quick
> fix.
> Just noticed this and thought the wording could be better. This
> paragraph below sounds like "One or more IRI objects are needed when
> @property is present. The subject value of any nested statement will
> cause triples to be generated if none of @href, @resource or @src are
> present." - but that is wrong (@property cannot be used with hanging
> relationships).
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdfa-core-20111215/#iri-object-resolution
>        One or more IRI objects are needed when @rel, @rev, or @property
>        is present. Each attribute will cause triples to be generated
>        when used with @href, @resource or @src, or with the subject
>        value of any nested statement if none of these attributes are
>        present.
> I suggest pulling @property out of the above statement and clarifying
> that present of @property does not necessarily produce IRI objects nor
> does @property apply to nested statements.
> Regards,
> James

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 09:45:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:30 UTC