Fwd: Hanging @property

Shane,

James is correct in his remark. This is a purely editorial change, so I went ahead and changed the rdfa core working document (ie, Overview-src). I hope this is fine with you.

James, thank you!

Ivan

Begin forwarded message:

> From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
> Subject: Hanging @property
> Date: February 8, 2012 21:17:40 GMT+01:00
> To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> 
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> Apologies for sending this directly to you, but it seems like a quick
> fix.
> 
> Just noticed this and thought the wording could be better. This
> paragraph below sounds like "One or more IRI objects are needed when
> @property is present. The subject value of any nested statement will
> cause triples to be generated if none of @href, @resource or @src are
> present." - but that is wrong (@property cannot be used with hanging
> relationships).
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdfa-core-20111215/#iri-object-resolution
> 
>        One or more IRI objects are needed when @rel, @rev, or @property
>        is present. Each attribute will cause triples to be generated
>        when used with @href, @resource or @src, or with the subject
>        value of any nested statement if none of these attributes are
>        present.
> 
> 
> I suggest pulling @property out of the above statement and clarifying
> that present of @property does not necessarily produce IRI objects nor
> does @property apply to nested statements.
> 
> Regards,
> James
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf