- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:06:47 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Message-Id: <BBE0BADD-0D53-4D48-9F0E-7DA4C8800E72@w3.org>
On Dec 11, 2012, at 21:02 , Manu Sporny wrote: > cc: Jeni (who originally raised one of the sub-issues in this e-mail) > > On 12/09/2012 04:35 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote: >> I found a problem in the latest draft. In "3.1 Additional RDFa >> Processing Rules", it says to use "HTMLLiteral" from the RDF >> vocabulary. But according to "RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: >> 5.2 The rdf:HTML Datatype" [1], that should be just "HTML". So >> replace the two occurrences of "HTMLLiteral" with "HTML". > > Fixed in the latest Editor's Draft, will have a pubrules-ready WD later > tonight. > >> Also, I think it's great that @value is supported. IIUC, it means >> that @value from <input> elements also can be captured with RDFa, >> correct? But I wonder why @value is defined to override @content, and >> not vice versa? I don't recall the reasons for that. (I was expecting >> @content to work just like @resource overrides @href. I.e. to always >> override any host language specific attribute; in this case, >> @value.) > > Here's the issue that led to the feature: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113 > > The original e-mail by Jeni Tennison: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Oct/0126.html > > and the resolution: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-11-17#resolution_3 > > It is troubling that @value overrides @content... seems like a bad thing > to do. Can anybody on the list remember why @value overrides @content? > Because we never thought of it:-) I am serious. Looking back at the issue mailings, this specific question never came up. > Also keep in mind that the side-effect of adding support for @value is > that @value is also used on the INPUT and LI elements in HTML5, which I > don't think was intended when we added this feature. I'm personally fine > with leaving the feature in there, and changing it so that @content > overrides @value if it exists. I agree. Ivan > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 11:07:32 UTC