- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:06:49 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 12/09/2012 11:47 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > Also, I think there is another issue in "4. Extensions to the HTML5 > Syntax". We do say "If the RDFa property attribute is present on the > link element, the rel attribute is not required.", which is good. But > I believe we must also add: > > If the RDFa resource attribute is present on the link element, the > href attribute is not required. > > Otherwise, if you want to use bnode references (or an empty value to > resolve to base, which apparently isn't allowed in link/@href [1]), > you must also add an unused non-empty @href just to be compliant. Fixed in the latest Editor's Draft, will have a pubrules-ready WD later tonight. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 02:07:27 UTC