W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:06:49 -0500
Message-ID: <50C7E6B9.4060307@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 12/09/2012 11:47 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote:
> Also, I think there is another issue in "4. Extensions to the HTML5
> Syntax". We do say "If the RDFa property attribute is present on the
> link element, the rel attribute is not required.", which is good. But
> I believe we must also add:
>     If the RDFa resource attribute is present on the link element, the
> href attribute is not required.
> Otherwise, if you want to use bnode references (or an empty value to
> resolve to base, which apparently isn't allowed in link/@href [1]),
> you must also add an unused non-empty @href just to be compliant.

Fixed in the latest Editor's Draft, will have a pubrules-ready WD later

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 02:07:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:32 UTC