W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:46:47 -0500
Message-ID: <50C7E207.6060403@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 12/02/2012 03:26 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Just  cursory look at the differences: didn't we decide that, if an
> element overrides an inherited curie prefix locally via a @prefix, a
> warning should be generated into the processor graph? That would also
> automatically include a warning if a prefix from the initial context
> is overwritten. I do not see that in the new draft.

Fixed in the latest Editor's Draft, will have a pubrules-ready WD later

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 01:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:32 UTC