- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:23:23 -0400
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- CC: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
I had an action to ask Mike Smith(tm) about transferring all remaining HTML+RDFa issues from the HTML WG tracker to the RDFa WG tracker. It turns out that all but one of these remaining issues were very minor editorial suggestions by Leif Halvard Sili. I just committed all of his changes verbatim (about 7 words in total) as they were all good changes. So, there is no longer a need to move those issues over from the HTML WG issue tracker. The remaining issue was the DTD-based validation for HTML+RDFa. I removed that section in the FPWD-ready HTML+RDFa spec that we will publish in early September. If there are no objections to that change, then all remaining HTML WG issues have been dealt with and there is nothing to move over to the RDFa issue tracker. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Which is better - RDFa Lite or Microdata? http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/
Received on Sunday, 19 August 2012 21:23:52 UTC