- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:21:15 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Congratulations:-) Ivan On Aug 19, 2012, at 23:23 , Manu Sporny wrote: > I had an action to ask Mike Smith(tm) about transferring all remaining > HTML+RDFa issues from the HTML WG tracker to the RDFa WG tracker. > > It turns out that all but one of these remaining issues were very minor > editorial suggestions by Leif Halvard Sili. I just committed all of his > changes verbatim (about 7 words in total) as they were all good > changes. So, there is no longer a need to move those issues over from > the HTML WG issue tracker. > > The remaining issue was the DTD-based validation for HTML+RDFa. I > removed that section in the FPWD-ready HTML+RDFa spec that we will > publish in early September. If there are no objections to that change, > then all remaining HTML WG issues have been dealt with and there is > nothing to move over to the RDFa issue tracker. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Which is better - RDFa Lite or Microdata? > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 07:21:42 UTC