- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:24:49 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 2011-05-27 23:07, Shane McCarron wrote: > I have made some changes to reflect the use of the term IRI. This is > still a work in progress, but you can see it at > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html > > Note that this is the live source, so it might change under you from > time to time. It is dated 27 May currently. As I make changes over the > weekend that date will change. > > In particular, please review the note I added in how to read this > document. I am interested in what people think about the tone of it: > >> RDFa is a way of expressing /RDF/-style relationships using simple >> attributes in existing markup languages such as HTML. RDF is fully >> internationalized, and permits the use of Internationalized Resource >> Identifiers, or IRIs. You will see the term 'IRI' used throughout this >> specification. Even if you are not familiar with the term IRI, you >> probably have seen the term 'URI' or 'URL'. IRIs are an extension of >> URIs that permit the use of characters outside of plain ASCII. RDF >> allows the use of these characters, and so does RDFa. This >> specification has been careful to use the correct term, IRI, to make >> it clear that this is the case. Sounds *very* good to me. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 21:25:27 UTC