- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 10:04:56 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
+1 Ivan On May 27, 2011, at 23:24 , Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-05-27 23:07, Shane McCarron wrote: >> I have made some changes to reflect the use of the term IRI. This is >> still a work in progress, but you can see it at >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html >> >> Note that this is the live source, so it might change under you from >> time to time. It is dated 27 May currently. As I make changes over the >> weekend that date will change. >> >> In particular, please review the note I added in how to read this >> document. I am interested in what people think about the tone of it: >> >>> RDFa is a way of expressing /RDF/-style relationships using simple >>> attributes in existing markup languages such as HTML. RDF is fully >>> internationalized, and permits the use of Internationalized Resource >>> Identifiers, or IRIs. You will see the term 'IRI' used throughout this >>> specification. Even if you are not familiar with the term IRI, you >>> probably have seen the term 'URI' or 'URL'. IRIs are an extension of >>> URIs that permit the use of characters outside of plain ASCII. RDF >>> allows the use of these characters, and so does RDFa. This >>> specification has been careful to use the correct term, IRI, to make >>> it clear that this is the case. > > Sounds *very* good to me. > > Best regards, Julian > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2011 08:02:49 UTC