- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 10:57:32 +0200
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I have one more comment/question.
In the RDFNode interface there is a separate toSring() and toNT() method. Is it really necessary to have these separately? In the case of the Triple interface toString() is defined as giving the NT representation of a triple, wouldn't it be more logical to say exactly the same for the individual Nodes, and drop the separate toNT() method?
Ivan
On May 2, 2011, at 01:21 , Nathan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to say that I think I'm done with the RDF Interfaces specification for now, and it's ready for a sanity check before preparing for FPWD.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/
>
> Since the last version there are a number of changes, I've fully rewritten the definition of Literal to reflect current conversations, GraphLiteral/TripleSet is gone, a couple of changes to the Graph interface ('the' is gone, 'match' is added, 'removeMatches' is added), RDFNode equality is redefined and clarified, a 'toValue' method is added to RDFNode (particularly for working with Literals), lot's of clarifications and cleanups to the text, issues and notes added etc.
>
> Please do have a read and let me know.
>
> Best,
>
> Nathan
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 08:56:18 UTC