- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:04:21 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote:
> I have one more comment/question.
>
> In the RDFNode interface there is a separate toSring() and toNT() method. Is it really necessary to have these separately? In the case of the Triple interface toString() is defined as giving the NT representation of a triple, wouldn't it be more logical to say exactly the same for the individual Nodes, and drop the separate toNT() method?
We need to have a stringifier on there, we can either decorate the value
with 'stringifier' (which entails implementations adding a toString
method) or have a separate toString method (as we do now), either way
the result of calling toString is quite different than calling toNT, and
both are needed, /especially/ for named nodes and literals. I find I use
both methods all the time (toNT a bit less), and toString is really
indispensable.
Best,
Nathan
> On May 2, 2011, at 01:21 , Nathan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a quick note to say that I think I'm done with the RDF Interfaces specification for now, and it's ready for a sanity check before preparing for FPWD.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/
>>
>> Since the last version there are a number of changes, I've fully rewritten the definition of Literal to reflect current conversations, GraphLiteral/TripleSet is gone, a couple of changes to the Graph interface ('the' is gone, 'match' is added, 'removeMatches' is added), RDFNode equality is redefined and clarified, a 'toValue' method is added to RDFNode (particularly for working with Literals), lot's of clarifications and cleanups to the text, issues and notes added etc.
>>
>> Please do have a read and let me know.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 14:05:13 UTC