- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:09:36 -0600
- To: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
The only recommendation out today is rdfa-syntax. I would cite that. Once RDFa Core is a recommendation, I would switch and cite that. On 1/19/2011 2:55 PM, Christoph LANGE wrote: > Dear all, > > when writing about CURIEs – not specifically in the context of RDFa –, > what should I cite? http://www.w3.org/TR/curie (of which there is now a > recent version, to my pleasant surprise), or section 6 of > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core? > > Cheers, and thanks in advance, > > Christoph > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:10:23 UTC