W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2011

Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note?

From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:34:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4D3758E1.3060202@jacobs-university.de>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Shane,

2011-01-19 22:09 Shane McCarron:
> The only recommendation out today is rdfa-syntax.  I would cite that.
> Once RDFa Core is a recommendation, I would switch and cite that.

Thanks!  I should have said, though, that in the context where I would
like to cite something about CURIEs I cover pretty recent stuff anyway
(e.g. also including RDFa 1.1).  From that point of view, would you
rather recommend citing the CURIE Note, or the RDFa Core Working Draft 
or, still, the RDFa (1.0) Syntax Recommendation?



Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype
Semantic Publication workshop, May 29 or May 30, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece
Submission deadline February 28, http://SePublica.mywikipaper.org

Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:34:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:23 UTC