Re: Atom 1.0 + RDFa 1.1

On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:31 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 11:18 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I will check whether the group would be authorized to publish a note
>> on something that is not in its charter in the first place. If so, and
>> the group agrees on the content, publishing a Note might be a good
>> idea indeed. 
> 
> Thanks - that would be my preferred route. If it proves tricky
> administratively, then Julian's suggestion of publishing an
> informational RFC might be a good alternative.
> 

It seems that there is no problem publishing a W3C WG Note.


> On a related note, when this WG ceases to be, what will happen to the
> wiki? Will it disappear; be archived in a read-only state; or continue
> to be fully usable by former WG members?
> 

It will certainly not disappear; it may become read-only, though.

Ivan


> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf