- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:42:39 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim-IHeDqAC0qkJ9k6rnkWLOXQPVB9nOIi7MqgaM@mail.gmail.com>
Toby, This is great! On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > Hoping to discuss this on the telecon under "any other business". > > I've been tinkering with an RDFa linter, currently to be found at: > > http://check.rdfa.info/ > > The idea is to parse a page for RDFa, then filter it in different ways > to show you what various services see. e.g. Google only looks at > properties and classes defined at <http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/#>; > Facebook only looks at the Open Graph Protocol properties. It also > performs some general linting like detecting the use of CURIEs with > undefined prefixes, etc. > This might be beyond the scope of the RDFa Linter, but have you thought of something like RDF Alerts [1] which does validation on the RDF data. See example report at [2]. It's still early days for RDF Alerts and it's being integrated with Sindice's inspector/wespector. Once it's more mature, maybe a link to Sindice's wedspector would do (to avoid duplicated efforts). Steph. [1] http://swse.deri.org/RDFAlerts/ [2] http://swse.deri.org/RDFAlerts/reports/4bfd2ff1a2806 > > I'd appreciate people's feedback. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 14:50:08 UTC