Re: Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC

I agree. What counts is the URI.

Ivan

On Jun 10, 2010, at 08:17 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:30:29 -0400
> Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
>> 2) ISSUE-5: @datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral (on Toby)
>>   http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/5
> 
> I have to send my regrets today I'm afraid, but here are my thoughts on
> the issue...
> 
> I think this issue is fairly non-contraversial. RDFa 1.0 and 1.1 both
> do/should require that XML literals are generated when the datatype
> URI is <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral>.
> However, the RDFa 1.0 rec was a little ambiguous as to whether this
> only happened if the @datatype CURIE was literally "rdf:XMLLiteral", or
> whether "xyz:XMLLiteral" also worked assuming that "xyz" was
> appropriately bound.
> 
> The RDFa 1.0 test suite makes it clear that "xyz" or anything else you
> like should work. But we probably need to clarify in the 1.1 spec that
> it's the URI you expand the datatype out to that matters, and not the
> CURIE/token found in the datatype attribute.
> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf