- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:27:27 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:10:46 -0500
Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/role-attribute/#using-role-in-conjunction-with-rdfa
>
> I know that people disagreed with this, but if we could reach a
> consensus I have a narrow window when I can update the draft before
> publication.
I don't think this draft should be attempting to make
normative-sounding requirements for RDFa processors. Rather, it could
say something like:
"""
When @role is included in a markup language that also includes RDFa
Core attributes [RDFA-CORE], a Processor that supports both RDFa and
@role MAY provide a graph that includes data from both. In that
case, it MUST process the role values as follows:
* The subject is the value of @id if present. Otherwise the subject is
a unique newly created bnode.
* The predicate is the term role in the vocabulary defined at
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab.
* Each value of @role is an object, forming an RDF triple with the
subject and predicate defined above.
"""
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 06:28:54 UTC