On Jan 27, 2014, at 5:39, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > >> On 26 Jan 2014, at 19:35, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> I suggest a response that explains it's rather late, and does not make a judgement about the comment. >> >> [[ >> RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax is already in the Proposed Recommendation state of the W3C process, and at this point it is no longer possible for the editors to make changes (besides trivial typo/grammar issues). Any design change will require going back to at least the Last Call stage. >> >> The Working Group has considered the normalization of language tags throughout its working phase and the design of semantic equivalence (comparison equivalence) was the final outcome. Normalization is one way to achieve that, it is not the only way. >> >> Your comment will remain on the RDF comments list and any future working group may decide to revisit this area. >> ]] > > Fine, that works for me. > > Richard Me, too. Regards, Dave (Editor hat on)Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 14:42:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC