On 26/01/14 21:24, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> On 26/01/14 14:23, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>> Thanks for the clarifications Ivan. ... >> [[ >> RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax is already in the Proposed >> Recommendation state of the W3C process, and at this point it is no >> longer possible for the editors to make changes (besides trivial >> typo/grammar issues). Any design change will require going back to at >> least the Last Call stage. >> >> The Working Group has considered the normalization of language tags >> throughout its working phase and the design of semantic equivalence >> (comparison equivalence) was the final outcome. Normalization is one >> way to achieve that, it is not the only way. >> >> Your comment will remain on the RDF comments list and any future >> working >> group may decide to revisit this area. >> ]] >> >> Andy >> >> (Yes - Jena stores lang tags as-is, based on feedback that some users >> expect what gets parsed is also what's written out again.) > > If be inclined to include that last parenthetical, It was not meant to be included (just the [[..]]) - more a disclosure as it's mentioned in the original. Jena will change to reflect RDF 1.1. We/Jena have to manage the transition anyway as persistent data is affected by RDF 1.1 (for simple literals => xsd:strings). Andy > > - Sandro > > >Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 14:04:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC