- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:06:31 +0100
- To: "'Guus Schreiber'" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "'Thomas Baker'" <tom@tombaker.org>
- Cc: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, "'Public RDF comments list'" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Monday, February 03, 2014 4:35 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > ====================================================================== > > Comments of substance > > > > -- "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for > > describing information about resources..." > > > > This definition uses the same three words as what it defines -- > > Resource, Description, and Framework. How about: > > > > The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for > > expressing information about things. > > See also responses to Bob and Antoine. Changed as suggested except for > "language". Admittedly, "framework" is a bit vague, but language would > create the wrong expression (with so many concrete syntaxes floating > around). What about "data model" instead of "framework" or "language"? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 19:07:06 UTC