Re: editorial change suggestion in primer

On 31-01-14 14:51, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a colleague read the RDF 1.1 Primer, and she suggested a small
> addition :
> in section 4 :
>
> Type restrictions on the subjects and objects of particular triples can
> be defined through *domain* respectively *range* restrictions.
>
> She suggested to add "respectively" at the end of the above sentence. I
> think this indeed makes things clearer.
>

Pierre-Antoine,

Thanks for the comment. Yes, good point, has been changed.

Guus

>    pa