owl:imports and graph names and issue 38

This is a formal comment on RDF Concepts 1.1

I am concerned that the resolution of issue 38 leaves a disconnect.

In particular, I think it is common practice to have datasets

<g1>  {

    <g1> rdf:type owl:Ontology

<g2> {

    <g2> rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
          owl:imports <g1> .

and this practice is somewhat undermined by the resolution of issue-38 which leaves a disconnect (^sd:name sd:graph) between the name and the graph.

Jeremy J Carroll
Principal Architect
Syapse, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 19:16:26 UTC