- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:54:17 -0800
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I don't view it as necessary to call out the skolemization stuff in changes, as it could always have been done. The only thing that Concepts now does is gives a bit of cover to what was more-or-less already happening. Maybe that clears the bar to be mentioned here, though, so I wouldn't gripe much more if that stayed in. peter On 11/27/2013 10:03 AM, David Wood wrote: > Thanks, Peter. > > I generally agree, but am curious why you think this Note shouldn't mention > Skolemization. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:32, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" > <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> The document isn't nearly finished, so this cannot be a complete review. >> >> >> Suggestion for important changes list: >> - named graphs >> - plain literals >> - datatypes >> - new syntaxes >> That's all! Note, nothing from semantics. >> >> >> There are several places where the document has too much, or misleading, >> information. >> >> - The paragraph saying the section is about Concepts is misleading and >> should be removed. >> >> - The paragraph saying that Concepts is definitional only. This is not a >> change, and even if it was, there is no need to talk about that here. The >> paragraph should be removed >> >> - Rewrite the new syntax paragraph to something like: >> RDF 1.1. introduces a number of new serialization formats. RDF/XML is no >> longer the only recommended serialization format and should be allowed to >> die a deserved death. The import of an RDF document is carried by the RDF >> graph (or RDF dataset) that results from the document. >> >> - The paragraph on DOM madness should read something like: >> Planned updates ... rdf:HTML. DOM version 4 is needed to clarify >> functionality ... formats. The unfinished status of .... >> >> - Generalized RDF should not be mentioned here. >> >> - Skolemization should not be mentioned here. >> >> The paragraph on datatypes should say that rdf:XMLLiteral support is optional. >> >> >> >> The Semantics section is copied from my message to implementers. It >> carries too much information and duplicates some of the stuff from before. >> >> The paragraphs starting "Literals", "There is", and "The rdf:XMLLiteral" >> can all be removed. >> >> >> >> >> >> More when the rest of the document shows up. >> >> >> peter >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 18:54:47 UTC