- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:03:17 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B08BCDD0-642A-4E9D-8CA9-D1F27D8ED932@3roundstones.com>
Thanks, Peter. I generally agree, but am curious why you think this Note shouldn't mention Skolemization. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:32, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > The document isn't nearly finished, so this cannot be a complete review. > > > Suggestion for important changes list: > - named graphs > - plain literals > - datatypes > - new syntaxes > That's all! Note, nothing from semantics. > > > There are several places where the document has too much, or misleading, information. > > - The paragraph saying the section is about Concepts is misleading and should be removed. > > - The paragraph saying that Concepts is definitional only. This is not a change, and even if it was, there is no need to talk about that here. The paragraph should be removed > > - Rewrite the new syntax paragraph to something like: > RDF 1.1. introduces a number of new serialization formats. RDF/XML is no longer the only recommended serialization format and should be allowed to die a deserved death. The import of an RDF document is carried by the RDF graph (or RDF dataset) that results from the document. > > - The paragraph on DOM madness should read something like: > Planned updates ... rdf:HTML. DOM version 4 is needed to clarify functionality ... formats. The unfinished status of .... > > - Generalized RDF should not be mentioned here. > > - Skolemization should not be mentioned here. > > The paragraph on datatypes should say that rdf:XMLLiteral support is optional. > > > > The Semantics section is copied from my message to implementers. It carries too much information and duplicates some of the stuff from before. > > The paragraphs starting "Literals", "There is", and "The rdf:XMLLiteral" can all be removed. > > > > > > More when the rest of the document shows up. > > > peter > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 18:03:46 UTC