RE: Rethinking how literals are defined

On Monday, November 18, 2013 10:02 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 18/11/13 14:32, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >
> >> >Concrete syntaxes need to say that the datatype of a literal is
> >> >implicitly rdf:langString if a language tag is present, and that it
> is
> >> >implicitly xsd:string if neither datatype nor language string are
> >> >present.
> > Right, but apart from Turtle and JSON-LD none of the syntaxes does
> so. This
> > needs to be fixed.
> 
> RDF/XML does.

I have to admit that I haven't looked at the RDF/XML spec for ages.. and
don't plan to (and hope don't have to) do so in the future :-)


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 14:29:43 UTC