Re: Rethinking how literals are defined

On 18/11/13 14:32, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>
>> >Concrete syntaxes need to say that the datatype of a literal is
>> >implicitly rdf:langString if a language tag is present, and that it is
>> >implicitly xsd:string if neither datatype nor language string are
>> >present.
> Right, but apart from Turtle and JSON-LD none of the syntaxes does so. This
> needs to be fixed.

RDF/XML does.

xml:lang => implicit rdf:langString

And something to cover the new no datatype, no language => xsd:string.

	Andy

Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 21:02:28 UTC