ACTION-322: Draft announcement emails for other lists

See below (implementers info to be included).

Comments very welcome. Target audience: semantic-web@w3.org and similar.

Guus

Subject: New RDF 1.1 publications & request for implementer feedback

The W3C RDF Working Group, which was chartered to simplify and improve 
RDF without breaking existing deployments, published this week five RDF 
1.1 documents as Candidate Recommendations:

   RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
     Main change is the inclusion of RDF Datasets as a mechanism for 
multiple graphs.
     The document also contains other updates based on community feedback

   RDF 1.1 Semantics: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/
     Updated to reflect the new Concepts document and community feedback 
on the
     previous RDF Semantics document. Co-edited by Pat Hayes and Peter 
Patel-Schneider

   RDF 1.1 TriG: http://www.w3.org/TR/trig/
     TriG is an extension of Turtle in order to handle multiple graphs
     This version of TriG differs slightly from the original proposal
     in order to maximize alignment with Turtle and SPARQL 1.1.

   RDF 1.1 N-Triples: http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/
   RDF 1.1 N-Quads: http://www.w3.org/TR/n-quads/
     N-Triples and N-Quads are minimalist subsets of Turtle resp. TriG.
     Both are line-based syntaxes and are popular as exchange format.

We are soliciting feedback from implementers on these specifications.
@@ implementation info here.

Earlier this year the group published a Turtle Candidate Recommendation 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/), which acts as a companion document to 
the documents above. The group has also published this week a Proposed 
Recommendation of JSON-LD, a JSON-based syntax for RDF data 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/).

More info on the RDF Working Group can be found at 
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/.

Thanks in advance for your feedback!

Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 21:36:20 UTC