* Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> [2013-11-02 20:18-0700]
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > Comments 19 and 20 are on the implementation report.
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#c19
> > I propose that Greg take ownership of those. (He's probably already
> > fixed the issues -- just needs to verify and mark "addressed”.)
>
> I can’t find the specific commit, but all EARL reports currently reference <http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/> from 10 May 2011.
>
> Point 19 addresses the link to this group, which is public-rdf-comments@w3.org, so this issue has been addressed.
> Point 20 is on the reference to the EARL spec, which has also been addressed.
>
> I’ll update the Wiki for these points as “addressed” referencing this email.
Cool, tx. I guess we should also respond to the commenter to at least let them know that things are fixed. Could you reply to the attached email saying that both of:
• broken link soliciting implementation reports
• stale EARL ref
have been fixed and asking if this addresses his comment?
> Gregg
>
> > Apart from that, all Turtle comments are addressed. Many still would
> > benefit from a "[RESOVED]" from the commentor.
> > --
> > -ericP
> >
> > office: +1.617.599.3509
> > mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
> >
> > (eric@w3.org)
> > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> > email address distribution.
> >
> > There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> > which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
> >
>
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Forwarded message 1
On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> I've posted EARL results for my turtle parser at:
>
> http://kasei.us/code/rdf-trine/rdf-trine-turtle-2013-03-01.ttl
Also, I had two editorial comments about the implementation report page at:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html
* The link to this mailing list soliciting implementation reports is broken.
* The version of EARL that is linked to from the implementation report is a WD from 2007. The latest EARL WD from 2011 [1] makes substantive changes to the EARL vocabulary (e.g. earl:pass becomes earl:passed). It seems that the implementation report page is already using the new terms, but the reference should be updated to avoid confusion.
thanks,
gregory williams
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/