Re: implementation reports

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>  On 11/01/2013 01:09 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>  Is there any problem with me sending out a personal heads-up to various
> groupa a bit in advance so that the process can start a bit early, or at
> least we can get an idea of who might participate?
>
>
> Please don't point them to that /TR URL, but if you point them to the
> editor's draft, it's fine.
>

OK.


>
> Looking more, I see respec has a field implementationReportURI.
>
> Also, I wonder about including your what's-changed text in either the
> SOTD, or on a wiki page we link to from the SOTD.   I'm inclined to go with
> the wiki version so we can update it.      In either case, I guess use
> respec's 'sotd' field to add it.
>

Wiki is better, I think, as there may be missing bits, and we might like to
update it independently of any official document.

>
>         - s
>
>
> peter