W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:31:48 +0000
Message-ID: <511CD934.8030701@epimorphics.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>

On 14/02/13 03:24, Manu Sporny wrote:
> It attempts to side-step an arbitrary constraint imposed on developers
> by RDF Concepts by making developers lives harder.

It's not arbitrary.

(This framing of the discussion isn't going to help move us forward.)

> You are stating that instead of doing the thing above, that we have to
> now require all developers to generate identifiers for that dataset by
> specifying an IRI for each graph:
> [{
>   "@id": "http://payswarm.com/transients#graph-38234jlkfsj9834u",
>   "@graph": {

Concretely, why is it that the the JSON-LD parser can not generate and 
insert the "@id" (either base-relative, or a UUID-based URI)?

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 12:32:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:25 UTC