- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:30:09 +0100
- To: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: "'RDF Working Group WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 6:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Markus, > > As I said, my preferred option is the one that the WG +1'd today: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Dec/0283.html > > But in the interest of having alternatives for the transition meeting, > here's another option that I could live with. > > On 17 Dec 2013, at 20:28, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > > I can't live with the complete removal of the HTML and XMLLiteral > > IRIs from that section. Readers will go to the section on "datatype > > IRIs" and to the definition of "recognized datatype IRI" to look for > > the requirements regarding datatype support, and can expect to find all > > datatype IRIs assigned by the RDF specs mentioned there. Sorry, I missed that mail. I assumed you can't live without the MUST statement in that section. > > I also think that omitting rationale for the non-normativity of the > > two datatypes would be a mistake, as it sends a wrong message. +1 > > I've stated what I believe is the cleanest way to avoid these two > > problems, so will just repeat the link: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Dec/0260.html > > > > I suppose it could also be done by adding a couple of notes to all > the affected subsections. > > In the sections rdf:HTML and rdf:XMLLiteral, add: > > [[ > This datatype is defined as non-normative because it depends on [DOM4], > a specification that has not yet reached W3C Recommendation status. > ]] +1 > In Section 5.4, REPLACE this: > > [[ > Recognized IRIs have fixed referents, which must satisfy these > conditions: > > If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral is > recognized then it refers to the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral > If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML is > recognized then it refers to the datatype rdf:HTML > [.] > ]] > > with this: > > [[ > Recognized IRIs have fixed referents, which must satisfy these > conditions: > > [.] > > Furthermore, the following IRIs are allocated for non-normative > datatypes: > > The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral refers to > the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral > The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML refers to the > datatype rdf:HTML > ]] +1, I would be very happy with something. It would allows us to keep the datatypes non-normative and defining their value space and l2v mapping correctly instead of being forced to say they are "implementation-dependent". I think this would also make the transition call much smoother. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 17:30:40 UTC