- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:11:11 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A42B64E2-7273-433B-B403-4BDF6FE9B18E@w3.org>
On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:58 , Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > > > On 18-12-13 11:52, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:09 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/figure2.svg >>> >>> On 18-12-13 09:36, Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> David, Markus >>>> >>>> in view of >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1264D17-45E9-4707-AB53-216317EFE62C@w3.org >>>> >>>> I believe we are at the point where we can also consider RDF/XML as >>>> part of the final publication set. The Concepts document has a >>>> reference to RDF/XML (stemming from the part on XML Literal), and we >>>> should not forget to update that reference to the new document. >>> >>> There is a ref in the local biblio file: [[RDF11-XML]] (and also >>> [[RDF11-SCHEMA]]). >> >> OK, thanks. I'll update Concepts to use these in a minute. >> >> What I meant in my previous mail to Ivan was whether the URL for those new >> documents stays the same as the old ones (e.g. >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/) or whether we'll update them to >> correspond to the new short names above (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-xml/). > > It is an edited rec, so we keep the old short-name. Indeed Ivan > >> >> Btw., RDF11-XML still references RDF-SCHEMA.. and do we still want to keep >> in all the references to RDFMS (from 1999) and the old RDFMS issues?? > > See review from Ivan: RDF-SCHEMA ref to be updated; old issues will be removed. > > Guus > > >> -- >> Markus Lanthaler >> @markuslanthaler ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 13:11:52 UTC