- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:58:02 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'W3C RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 18-12-13 11:52, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:09 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/figure2.svg >> >> On 18-12-13 09:36, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> David, Markus >>> >>> in view of >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1264D17-45E9-4707-AB53-216317EFE62C@w3.org >>> >>> I believe we are at the point where we can also consider RDF/XML as >>> part of the final publication set. The Concepts document has a >>> reference to RDF/XML (stemming from the part on XML Literal), and we >>> should not forget to update that reference to the new document. >> >> There is a ref in the local biblio file: [[RDF11-XML]] (and also >> [[RDF11-SCHEMA]]). > > OK, thanks. I'll update Concepts to use these in a minute. > > What I meant in my previous mail to Ivan was whether the URL for those new > documents stays the same as the old ones (e.g. > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/) or whether we'll update them to > correspond to the new short names above (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-xml/). It is an edited rec, so we keep the old short-name. > > Btw., RDF11-XML still references RDF-SCHEMA.. and do we still want to keep > in all the references to RDFMS (from 1999) and the old RDFMS issues?? See review from Ivan: RDF-SCHEMA ref to be updated; old issues will be removed. Guus > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 10:58:31 UTC