W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Reference to be changed in Concepts

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:58:02 +0100
Message-ID: <52B17FBA.5060200@vu.nl>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'W3C RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 18-12-13 11:52, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:09 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/figure2.svg
>>
>> On 18-12-13 09:36, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>> David, Markus
>>>
>>> in view of
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1264D17-45E9-4707-AB53-216317EFE62C@w3.org
>>>
>>> I believe we are at the point where we can also consider RDF/XML as
>>> part of the final publication set. The Concepts document has a
>>> reference to RDF/XML (stemming from the part on XML Literal), and we
>>> should not forget to update that reference to the new document.
>>
>> There is a ref in the local biblio file: [[RDF11-XML]] (and also
>> [[RDF11-SCHEMA]]).
>
> OK, thanks. I'll update Concepts to use these in a minute.
>
> What I meant in my previous mail to Ivan was whether the URL for those new
> documents stays the same as the old ones (e.g.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/) or whether we'll update them to
> correspond to the new short names above (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-xml/).

It is an edited rec, so we keep the old short-name.

>
> Btw., RDF11-XML still references RDF-SCHEMA.. and do we still want to keep
> in all the references to RDFMS (from 1999) and the old RDFMS issues??

See review from Ivan: RDF-SCHEMA ref to be updated; old issues will be 
removed.

Guus


> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 10:58:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC