- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:52:46 +0100
- To: "'W3C RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:09 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/figure2.svg > > On 18-12-13 09:36, Ivan Herman wrote: > > David, Markus > > > > in view of > > > > http://www.w3.org/mid/E1264D17-45E9-4707-AB53-216317EFE62C@w3.org > > > > I believe we are at the point where we can also consider RDF/XML as > > part of the final publication set. The Concepts document has a > > reference to RDF/XML (stemming from the part on XML Literal), and we > > should not forget to update that reference to the new document. > > There is a ref in the local biblio file: [[RDF11-XML]] (and also > [[RDF11-SCHEMA]]). OK, thanks. I'll update Concepts to use these in a minute. What I meant in my previous mail to Ivan was whether the URL for those new documents stays the same as the old ones (e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/) or whether we'll update them to correspond to the new short names above (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-xml/). Btw., RDF11-XML still references RDF-SCHEMA.. and do we still want to keep in all the references to RDFMS (from 1999) and the old RDFMS issues?? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 10:53:18 UTC