W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2013

Re: JSON-LD Syntax 1.0 - Candidate Recommendation-ready document

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:53:44 -0700
Message-Id: <5EF94546-F432-4E7F-B293-57F38B2722AD@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, "<public-rdf-wg@w3.org>" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:17 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Friday, August 16, 2013 11:48 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> What defines passing a test with bNode named graphs?  After reading
>> Markus's position on isomorphism, I don't know what it takes to pass a
> That was not really a position. It was more asking whether I understand our
> intention correctly (which I'm still not sure) and showing another way to
> look at it.
>> test (well, if the output is structurally isomorphic it passes, the
>> question is more about negative tests and about weaker equivalences).
> Currently we take a rather pragmatic approach given that all the algorithms
> produce deterministic bnode identifiers. A test passes if the resulting
> N-Quads are the same (after being sorted). Most of us compare the result
> directly, i.e., require that the same blank node identifiers are used; Gregg
> (I believe) checks whether the result is isomorphic to the expected result.

Actually, I do a textual comparison too, although it would be reasonable to test for isomorphism.


>> PS there is a link in
>>   http://json-ld.org/test-suite/reports/
>> to
>>   http://json-ld.org/tests/
> Fixed:
> https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/4fdd5d1a4dcb273897074005eda386
> 837f97dda6
> I changed it to point to http://json-ld.org/test-suite/. I'm not sure though
> that that's the right target. Gregg?
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 14:54:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:31 UTC