- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:42:43 -0700
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hmm, everything looks OK for Semantics, but the checker is complaining. Maybe someone else can take a quick look to see what is going on. peter On 04/03/2013 09:33 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > All, > > I've written a short wiki page with tips for publishing ReSpec docs: > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_documents > > For those of you with more experience with ReSpec: please check/correct. > > Peter: we have a local copy of the biblio file in our repository, see the > wiki page. > > Hope this helps, > Guus > > On 03-04-13 18:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> I fixed the internal links in Semantics, commenting out many of them. >> >> Semantics now has [[...]] for RDF-PLAIN-LITERAL and RDF-VOCABULARY, >> neither of which appear to exist in the DB. If someone points me at >> the DB I can try to fix these as well. >> >> peter >> >> On 04/03/2013 08:04 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> There were some problems with publishing the 4 FPWDs: >>> >>> - we're using an out-of-date version of ResPec >>> - docs were not pu-rules compliant [1]. I did not have time to >>> ccorrect all of them, in particular the broken links in the Semantics >>> document. >>> >>> Guus >>> >>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 23:49:07 UTC