RE: delay in publication WDs

Peter, the simplest thing is probably to add the following code 

 

  <script
src='https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/ReSpec.js/bibref/biblio.js'
class='remove'></script>

 

right after 

 

  <script src='https://www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common'
class='remove'></script>

 

This will overwrite ReSpecs biblio DB.

 

 

Hope this helps,

Markus

 

 

--

Markus Lanthaler

@markuslanthaler

 

 

 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com]

> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:17 PM

> To: Guus Schreiber

> Cc: RDF WG

> Subject: Re: delay in publication WDs

> 

> I am close to getting Semantics through, but I don't know how to update

> the

> biblio db for the right version of ReSpec.

> 

> My current result is at

>  <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html#>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html#

> 

> peter

> 

> On 04/03/2013 09:33 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:

> > All,

> >

> > I've written a short wiki page with tips for publishing ReSpec docs:

> >

> >

> >
<http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_document
s> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-

 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_document
s> > based_documents

> >

> > For those of you with more experience with ReSpec: please

> check/correct.

> >

> > Peter: we have a local copy of the biblio file in our repository, see

> the

> > wiki page.

> >

> > Hope this helps,

> > Guus

> >

> > On 03-04-13 18:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> >> I fixed the internal links in Semantics, commenting out many of

> them.

> >>

> >> Semantics now has [[...]] for RDF-PLAIN-LITERAL and RDF-VOCABULARY,

> >> neither of which appear to exist in the DB.   If someone points me

> at

> >> the DB I can try to fix these as well.

> >>

> >> peter

> >>

> >> On 04/03/2013 08:04 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:

> >>> All,

> >>>

> >>> There were some problems with publishing the 4 FPWDs:

> >>>

> >>> - we're using an out-of-date version of ResPec

> >>> - docs were not pu-rules compliant [1]. I did not have time to

> >>> ccorrect all of them, in particular the broken links in the

> Semantics

> >>> document.

> >>>

> >>> Guus

> >>>

> >>>

> >>