Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 23/10/12 20:32, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> The WG could revive [1], which was abandoned/shelved quite some
> time ago in favour of seeing how JSON-LD turns out.
> 
> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html

- -1 on this.

I've worked quite a bit with RDF/JSON. It is far from being
idiomatic JSON and doesn't address how to work with "normal
looking" JSON with RDF glasses on. It is also not really
suitable for putting into document stores like MongoDB. The
benefit over, say, turtle isn't really very clear in my
opinion.

Cheers,
- -w

- -- 
William Waites MBCS
Network Engineer                          Research Fellow
High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland   School of Informatics
University of Stirling                    University of Edinburgh
http://www.tegola.org.uk/                 wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=L968
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 08:40:53 UTC