- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:52:35 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: team-prov-chairs@w3.org, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul, The RDF WG has discussed your questions below and we have decided that it is rather difficult for us to be sure that we are responding in the way you wish. As you undoubtedly know, the provenance docs are getting rather large and the constraints doc does not stand alone for review. Are you able to formulate more targeted questions for us to consider? For example, are you concerned that a particular feature of PROV Constraints relies upon RDF semantics, or a particular interpretation? Any more detailed guidance would help our reviewers greatly. Thanks. Regards, Dave -- David Wood, Ph.D. 3 Round Stones http://3roundstones.com Cell: +1 540 538 9137 On Sep 17, 2012, at 11:29, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you. We acknowledge your request and have it on our agenda [1] for Wednesday. We will advise our reviewers to send comments to your comments list [2]. > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.09.19#Provenance_Constraints_Review > [2] mailto:public-prov-comments@w3.org > > > On Sep 17, 2012, at 07:07, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > >> Dear Guus, David, >> >> As you've seen, we just published last call of Constraints of the PROV >> Data Model [1]. We are interested in the RDF WG feedback on this >> document. >> >> Questions we have are: >> - Does the terminology, Bundle and Document work with the terminology >> in the RDF WG? >> - With respect to Bundle and Document do the defined constraints work >> with what is potentially being specified in RDF? >> >> We are looking forward to your feedback on this document and also the >> other last call documents. >> >> Thanks for your time, >> Paul >> >> -- >> -- >> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >> Assistant Professor >> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | >> Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science >> - The Network Institute >> VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 17:53:04 UTC