Re: three kinds of dataset

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal#Semantics

What precedes this in the wiki is Richard's proposal, which concerns the 
syntax. Richard does not necessarily endorse the semantics.


Le 06/03/2012 17:49, Peter F. Patel-Schneider a écrit :
> From: Pat Hayes<phayes@ihmc.us>
> Subject: three kinds of dataset
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:55:58 -0600
>
>> Ive been trying to pull all these threads together. Seems to me that the
>> use cases for quads/datasets fall into three main categories, which
>> demand different semantic approaches if we are going to try to avoid
>> interoperability confusion. (Now I understand Antoine's proposal I see
>> how it manages to be a kind of weakest-possible-blanket-case which
>> allows something like all three of these to kind of work, but I would
>> argue that we can do better, because this fit-all approach doesn't
>> really fit anything quite properly. More below.)
>
> By the way, where is Antoine's proposal?
>
> peter
>
>

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 83 36
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 17:31:49 UTC