- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:31:41 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal#Semantics What precedes this in the wiki is Richard's proposal, which concerns the syntax. Richard does not necessarily endorse the semantics. Le 06/03/2012 17:49, Peter F. Patel-Schneider a écrit : > From: Pat Hayes<phayes@ihmc.us> > Subject: three kinds of dataset > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:55:58 -0600 > >> Ive been trying to pull all these threads together. Seems to me that the >> use cases for quads/datasets fall into three main categories, which >> demand different semantic approaches if we are going to try to avoid >> interoperability confusion. (Now I understand Antoine's proposal I see >> how it manages to be a kind of weakest-possible-blanket-case which >> allows something like all three of these to kind of work, but I would >> argue that we can do better, because this fit-all approach doesn't >> really fit anything quite properly. More below.) > > By the way, where is Antoine's proposal? > > peter > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 83 36 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 17:31:49 UTC