- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:00:55 -0400
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I particularly don't understand why rdf:value would be used when emulating general n-ary relations. Could you enlighten me? peter PS: I find the example in the RDF Primer to be totally incorrect. On 06/06/2012 10:52 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > > > On 31-05-2012 17:38, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> Seems some are switching *to* rdf:value? > > [cultural open-data hat on] > > We've done the same in the past. Actually, rdf;value makes a lot of > conceptual sense in a binary data model like RDF, as nodes are relatively > freuntly used for n-ary relations. > > Guus > >> >> Perhaps the property has, erm, value after all? >> >> Dan >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 15:01:30 UTC