- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:52:24 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 31-05-2012 17:38, Dan Brickley wrote: > > Seems some are switching *to* rdf:value? [cultural open-data hat on] We've done the same in the past. Actually, rdf;value makes a lot of conceptual sense in a binary data model like RDF, as nodes are relatively freuntly used for n-ary relations. Guus > > Perhaps the property has, erm, value after all? > > Dan > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From:* ljgarcia <leylajael@gmail.com <mailto:leylajael@gmail.com>> >> *Date:* 31 May 2012 07:56:57 PDT >> *To:* Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group >> <bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>> >> *Subject:* *rdf:value instead bibo:content* >> *Reply-To:* >> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have seen at >> http://bibotools.googlecode.com/svn/bibo-ontology/trunk/doc/index.html >> that bibo:content is deprecated and rdf:value is recommended instead. >> We are working with portions of the document, e.g. sections and >> paragraphs rather than the whole document. We need to model the >> content so bibo:content seems to be the right property but (i) it is >> deprecated, and (ii) it takes bibo:Document as domain. >> Any suggestions? I find using rdf:value some inaccurate and confusing, >> I rather to use a more specific property. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Leyla García >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group?hl=en. >>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 14:53:00 UTC