- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:03:58 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 6 June 2012 08:00, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > I particularly don't understand why rdf:value would be used when emulating > general n-ary relations. Could you enlighten me? That was one of it's original uses; alongside being the old name for rdf:object. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jul/0252.html for the messy history... Dan > peter > > PS: I find the example in the RDF Primer to be totally incorrect. > > > On 06/06/2012 10:52 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> >> >> >> On 31-05-2012 17:38, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>> >>> Seems some are switching *to* rdf:value? >> >> >> [cultural open-data hat on] >> >> We've done the same in the past. Actually, rdf;value makes a lot of >> conceptual sense in a binary data model like RDF, as nodes are relatively >> freuntly used for n-ary relations. >> >> Guus >> >>> >>> Perhaps the property has, erm, value after all? >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 15:04:28 UTC