- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:13:50 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 01/02/12 16:23, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 2/1/12 11:16 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> I'm not opposed to quads or SPARQL at all; I'm just trying to understand >> what's reasonable to add (or even change*shudder*) to provide solutions >> for the use cases. >> >> -- Sandro > I truly believe, use cases will come from field use across industry. > When this happens en masse, and the limitations of existing specs and > implementations a prohibitively taxed, there will be an obvious trigger > for RDF v.Next. Until then, tinkering with what's in the midst of a > prolonged and protracted bootstrap will always meet coherent and > pragmatic resistance :-) I agree - what we have as use cases now are unlikely to be the only important ones as industrial use grows. We can over-worry about our use cases. Andy > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder& CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web:http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile:https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > >
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 12:14:18 UTC