- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:23:22 -0500
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F2966FA.2040408@openlinksw.com>
On 2/1/12 11:16 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > I'm not opposed to quads or SPARQL at all; I'm just trying to understand > what's reasonable to add (or even change*shudder*) to provide solutions > for the use cases. > > -- Sandro I truly believe, use cases will come from field use across industry. When this happens en masse, and the limitations of existing specs and implementations a prohibitively taxed, there will be an obvious trigger for RDF v.Next. Until then, tinkering with what's in the midst of a prolonged and protracted bootstrap will always meet coherent and pragmatic resistance :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:23:46 UTC