W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Minimal dataset semantics

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:34:56 +0100
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Message-Id: <6DCE1C0C-50DF-404A-BE3F-8593EBF06347@cyganiak.de>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On 24 Aug 2012, at 11:57, Ivan Herman wrote:
> A possible compromise would be to have an entailment regime selected for the default graph and another one selected for all named graphs. That would make things simpler; it is certainly a simplification of Antoine's current scheme.

What do you mean by "selecting"? Do you mean there should be RDF triples somewhere that state what semantics is in effect in the default graph and in all named graphs?

I'm not quite sure what the purpose would be. "Selecting entailment regimes" makes sense for the configuration of a reasoner or of a query engine. I don't understand why one would want to have that in the RDF Semantics spec.

Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 11:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:20 UTC