Re: Minimal dataset semantics

On 8/24/12 7:34 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2012, at 11:57, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> A possible compromise would be to have an entailment regime selected for the default graph and another one selected for all named graphs. That would make things simpler; it is certainly a simplification of Antoine's current scheme.
> What do you mean by "selecting"? Do you mean there should be RDF triples somewhere that state what semantics is in effect in the default graph and in all named graphs?
>
> I'm not quite sure what the purpose would be. "Selecting entailment regimes" makes sense for the configuration of a reasoner or of a query engine. I don't understand why one would want to have that in the RDF Semantics spec.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
>
Richard,

You may have inadvertently stumbled upon solution to a problem. 
Basically, paraphrasing your comments above, it should be made crystal 
clear that: selecting entailment regimes makes sense for the 
configuration of a reasoner or of a query engine.


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen