W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: retronyms, Abstract/Maintained Graph

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:52:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFpt6uuhMbxWRYxyjSoFHPGuDsOaXFQQ=S_2O_sW+SJGKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 23 August 2012 17:00, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> You lost me here, sorry.   What's the use case for an immutable named graph?

How about official snapshot releases of gigantic datasets (wikidata or
freebase dumps, BTC, etc.). We could speak of 'full dbpedia dump as of
2012-05-01', regardless of where the triples were gotten (ntriples,
caches, dvd/cdrom, bittorrent).


> And it sounds like you're suggesting "mutable named graph" as the official
> term for g-box.  Is that right?
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 16:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:19 UTC