- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:30:22 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:55:18AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > > Wouldn't it be slightly more accurate (but perhaps less understandable) to > > say that the predicate IRI denotes "a property, that is, a resource that > > can be interpreted as a binary relation"? > > Yes. Or more accurately still, "...which is being interpreted as a...." . Not "meant to be interpreted" (i.e., by the people who coined it)? -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:31:02 UTC