Re: Contradicting definitions of ?property?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:55:18AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be slightly more accurate (but perhaps less understandable) to
> > say that the predicate IRI denotes "a property, that is, a resource that
> > can be interpreted as a binary relation"?
> 
> Yes. Or more accurately still, "...which is being interpreted as a...." .

Not "meant to be interpreted" (i.e., by the people who coined it)?

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:31:02 UTC